Intel Clovertown: Quad Core for the Masses

56 Comments

View All Comments

• yyrkoon - Monday, April 2, 2007 - link

  You can not read, and understand what I am writting, and I am the dolt or moron . . .
  
  Interresting that . . . interresting indeed. I think what I will do, is just ignore whatever else you have to say, just like the majority of other readers seemingly have done.

• archcommus - Friday, March 30, 2007 - link

  However if Barcelona comes out and then Penryn smashes it just a few months later, yeah, then I'm gonna be worried about them. :(

• Griswold - Saturday, March 31, 2007 - link

  Say no to drugs.

• anony - Friday, March 30, 2007 - link

  This is for the authors. Sorry if I missed it, but do the power measurements
  include chipset power? AMD processors include the memory controller as well,
  right? Do the performance/watt take this into account?

• Ross Whitehead - Friday, March 30, 2007 - link

  We measured power at the wall, but we do not include the power for the disk chassis.
  
  Thus, performance/watt takes all of your mentioned items into account.

• blckgrffn - Friday, March 30, 2007 - link

  I am guessing Pernyn will be different enough from Clovertown to make using vmotion (and many other enterprise features) impossible. It sucks enough that we already have two processor families in our Dell 2950's, and here comes one more.
  
  I am all for progress, it just looks like this might be something VMware has to address at some point.
  
  Nat

• Beenthere - Friday, March 30, 2007 - link

  ...the industry. As usual Intel's "glueblob" is another rushed-out-the-door, knee-jerk reaction to AMD supplying superior CPU products. AMD is really gonna hurt Intel with Barcelona and friends.

• johnsonx - Friday, March 30, 2007 - link

  Beenthere + Cornfedone = Cramitpal

• Griswold - Saturday, March 31, 2007 - link

  You forgot to add some "fine-ass".

• Phynaz - Friday, March 30, 2007 - link

  Wow, you really are a moron.